Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition by James P. Blevins, Juliette Blevins

By James P. Blevins, Juliette Blevins

During this ebook, top researchers in morphology, syntax, language acquisition, psycholinguistics, and computational linguistics handle significant questions about the shape and acquisition of analogy in grammar. What forms of styles do audio system pick out because the foundation for analogical extension? What kinds of goods are really weak or immune to analogical pressures? At what degrees do analogical tactics function and the way do methods engage? What formal mechanisms are acceptable for modelling analogy? the radical synthesis of typological, theoretical, computational, and developmental paradigms during this quantity brings us in the direction of answering those questions than ever prior to.

Show description

Read or Download Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition PDF

Similar language & grammar books

Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction

This quantity contributes to the burgeoning box of analysis on stance by means of providing various reviews established in typical discourse. those accumulated papers discover the positioned, pragmatic, and interactional personality of stancetaking, and current new versions and conceptions of stance to spark destiny study.

Missionary Linguistics IV Linguistica Misionera IV: Selected papers from the Fifth International Conference on Missionary Linguistics, Mérida, Yucatán, ... in the History of the Language Sciences)

This fourth quantity on Missionary Linguistics specializes in lexicography. It encompasses a choice of papers derived from the 5th foreign convention on Missionary Linguistics held in Mérida, Yucatán (Mexico), 14th–17th March 2007. As with the former 3 volumes (2004, on basic concerns, 2005, on orthography and phonology, and 2007 on morphology and syntax), this quantity appears to be like on the lexicographical creation of missionaries usually, the impression of eu assets, corresponding to Ambrogio Calepino and Antonio de Nebrija, translation theories, attitudes towards non-Western cultures, trans- and interculturality, semantics, morphological research and organizational rules of the dictionaries, reminiscent of kinds and constitution of the entries, quotation types, and so forth.

Proto-Romance Morphology: Comparative Romance Grammar, Vol. III

This quantity offers with the reconstructed morphology of Proto-Romance. it's the 3rd in a sequence by way of this writer. the 1st quantity (1974, Elsevier) offers with the exterior historical past of the Romance languages: the stipulations lower than which they constructed, have been used, and (in a few circumstances) went out of use. the second one quantity (1976, Elsevier) treats the phonology in their universal resource, Proto-Romance.

Understanding digital literacies : a practical introduction

1. Mediated Me half 1: electronic instruments 2. details in all places three. Hyperreading and Hyperwriting four. Multimodality five. on-line Language and Social interplay 6. realization buildings 7. serious Literacy half 2: electronic Practices eight. on-line Cultures and Intercultural verbal exchange nine. video games, studying and Literacy 10.

Additional resources for Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition

Sample text

M? lh:? lh:? lh:? lm? hu´:LH ‘lie’, kia´:nLH ‘sweep’, hı¨´ :nLH ‘argue’ P10 lh? lh? lh? lm? lh? lh? lh? m? lh? lh? lh? lm? iu:nM ‘inside’ PCMB lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? LH ‘open out’ PCMC lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? LM ‘rest’ PDCC dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? H ‘bless’ P8A m: m: (Source: Pace 1990: 48–51) m: l:? m: m: m: m? m: m: m: l:? 9, with thirteen diVerent conjugations. We say that the paradigm P of a member of conjugation J is maximally transparent if each pairing of a property set with an exponent in P is unique across all conjugations to the paradigms of members of J.

LM ‘rest’ PDCC dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? dh? H ‘bless’ P8A m: m: (Source: Pace 1990: 48–51) m: l:? m: m: m: m? m: m: m: l:? 9, with thirteen diVerent conjugations. We say that the paradigm P of a member of conjugation J is maximally transparent if each pairing of a property set with an exponent in P is unique across all conjugations to the paradigms of members of J. If lexeme L has a maximally transparent paradigm P, any cell in P can serve as L’s sole dynamic principal part. Fig.

Dh? dhl:? dh? dmh? h? h? h? h? h? lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? l? l? m? ’ dh? dhl:? dh? dmh? h? h? h? h? h? lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? lh? l? l? m? ’ dh? dhl:? dh? dmh? l? l? m:? m:? m:? m? m? m? m? m? m? l? l? m? ’ dh? dl:? dm? dlh? l? l? m:? m:? m:? m? m? m? m? m? m? l? m? m? ’ dh? dhl:? dh? dmh? h? h? m:? m:? m:? lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? lh:? l? m? m? ’ dh? dhl:? dh? dmh? l? lm? m? m:? lm? m: m:? l: l:? lh:? lm? l? m? m? ’ dh? dhl:? dh? dmh? l? l? m:? m:? m:? lm? lm? lm? lm? lm? lm? l? m? m? ’ dh? dl:?

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.11 of 5 – based on 33 votes